A
look at the cards - who needs what?
The question here isnt "Is this card
fast?" but rather "Which card is right for me?" Each of them has
reached a 90%+ rating, earning a RS Hardcore Award. Yet they differ immensely in feature
set and driver support. In the end, most people are probably going to base their decision
on price and/or availability anyway.
One last word on image quality. I
donīt have any test equipment to compare the cards in terms of this but I used all GF3
cards on an ELSA ECOMO 19H98 Monitor. I get a much sharper image on this monitor with the
new GeForce 3 cards compared to GeForce 2 Ultra cards I used before. So the only thing I
can say here: It looks like GeForce 3 cards offer a pretty good image quality.
Here is a summary of each of the cards
strengths and weaknesses in alphabetical order:
ASUS V8200 Deluxe 95%
As usual, ASUS has created a very impressive and
versatile card with the V8200 Deluxe. Even visually, the 8200 is a treat. MP clan players
should be warned though. Anti-cheating tools like Punkbuster ban players using ASUS
drivers because of the resurfaced see-through option. Playing on a Punkbuster protected
Half-Life server is only possible with NVIDIAs reference driver which
dont support the full Deluxe functionality. Nonetheless, the 8200 definitely
deserves first place. No other card has more to offer. |
ELSA GLADIAC 920 92%
The GLADIAC 920 is a solid card. Despite its
unspectacular cooling it is one of the best overclockers in this shootout. The drivers
where something of a disappointment, though. ELSA drivers used to offer a lot more
features and tweaks. Not even the gaming bundle can make up for this completely. This card
would also shine with TV-In. Many fans are still hoping for a successor to the Erazor II
ViVo or even the Erazor 128 Video. Instead, ELSA seems to have given up this market
segment without a fight, leaving MSI, ASUS and Gainward to duke it out. |
Gainward CARDEXpert GF3
93%
What is Gainward trying to tell us with this new red
look? Poisonous? Devilish? To die for? Hmmm, you werent expecting an answer, were
you? This cards only weakness can be found in the software. The overclocking tool
doesnt seem to be working optimally yet, which isnt too tragic, considering
that the OC options in the reference drivers work quite well once you unlock them. What
this card really lacks is a video viewing software. Although you can (ab)use the video
editing suite or even the trial version of Digital VCR for this purpose, this is a far
from elegant solution. If youre planning to make full use of the Video-In features,
get ready to do some experimenting. Otherwise, this card is a safe bet. |
Hercules 3D Prophet III 91%
Purists and hardcore overclockers will love this card.
Unfortunately, my review sample was still a very early A3 model and consequently not much
of an overclocker, despite its excellent cooling solution. Im looking into getting
my hands on a newer model and doing some re-testing. If youre not so hot about
bundles, tools and gimmicks, this card is a good choice for you. |
Leadtek WinFast GeForce 3 TD 92%
Leadteks GeForce 3 TD is an interesting offer. The
only points of criticism are the short-lived fan and the ineffectual memory heatsinks
both of which were already criticized on Leadteks GeForce 2 ULTRA. As great
as the card looks, function must come before form. Aside from that, this card regularly
beat out the competition and has earned the performance crown of this shootout. |
MSI StarForce 822 93%
MSI wants a part of the video card market, and it shows.
Well, if the 822 is any indication, theyre on the right track. The lack of any kind
of video software is quite disappointing in a card that features both Video-In and Out.
What good is a TV input if there is no software to make it usable?! Sure, there are plenty
of freeware programs available for download but not everyone knows how or where to
find them. In this price category, I find this should not be a problem the tools
should be included. The boards good overclocking potential came as a bit of a
surprise, considering that the memory has no heatsinks. Obviously, using no heatsinks is
better than too large ones *cough*Leadtek*cough*. |
Visiontek GeForce 3 91%
Aside from the only partially usable TV-Out (that also
plagues the Hercules and Leadtek cards) and decent 3D performance, the Visiontek board
doesnt have much to offer the potential buyer not even a software DVD player.
If youre not looking to pick up a software bundle with the card, you might be quite
happy with this offer. And lets not forget, the overclocking potential is among the
best in the group. |
- The End -
Lars
"Borsti" Weinand - Editor In Chief - RIVA Station 2001
English translation by Benjamin Kraft
- Great Work Ben!
Some notes about this review:
- The article really got too long. Yet at the same time it
is still too short to cover all the cards in-depth. If you have specific questions, feel
free to send an email!
- What was ASUS thinking, sending me a "tweaked"
driver? The driver from the burned CD I received had the dynamic overclocking enabled by
default. Coincidence? As a result, the card ran at 220/500MHz instead of the normal
200/460MHz. At first I didnt notice because ist shows normal 200/460 on the desktop
(in Powestrip), but during the comparative benchmarking I started wondering why the V8200
was outperfoming the rest. The "bug" was "fixed" in the v12.10 drivers
I was hastily sent after I inquired about this at ASUS.
- The Gainward card is missing from the group shot at the
top of page 41. I only had it for a limited amount of time and had to send it back before
I was able to get the rest of the cards.
- The benchmarks alone took almost one and a half weeks and
had to be rerun (several times) in some instances, owing to new driver releases!
|